Skip to main content

Comparison

Barefoot vs Tokeet

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management Software

Barefoot

Enterprise-grade vacation rental PMS built for customization and scale

Best for Scale

Enterprise PMS that rewards operators who outgrow simpler tools

From $800 • Free trial

Property Management Software

Tokeet

Affordable per-property vacation rental management with strong channel coverage

Best Value

Strong feature-to-price ratio for budget-conscious property managers

From $14.99/listing • Free trial

Visit Barefoot →Visit Tokeet →
✓Editorial verdict

Which Should You Pick: Barefoot or Tokeet?

Pick Barefoot if you manage 20+ vacation rental units and need enterprise-grade trust accounting, deep workflow customization, and an open API with 60+ technology partners — the $800/mo base pays for itself in operational control at scale. Pick Tokeet if you run under 50 listings and want affordable per-property pricing ($14.99/listing/mo, no booking fees) with broader OTA channel coverage out of the box.

Editorial perspective from the Barefoot side; factual claims about Tokeet are drawn from its review.

Pricing Side-by-Side

From $800 • Free trial

1–50 units

$800/mo

50 listings

Booking fee: 1% of rent on Airbnb/VRBO bookings

  • Full trust accounting
  • Owner statements
  • Reservation and booking management
  • Customizable workflows, fees, and reporting
  • Direct integrations to Airbnb, VRBO, TripAdvisor
  • Open API access
Try Barefoot

51–100 units

$1,100/mo

100 listings

Booking fee: 1% of rent on Airbnb/VRBO bookings

  • Everything in 1–50 tier
Try Barefoot

From $14.99/listing • Free trial

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What Barefoot does well

  • Highly configurable platform instead of preset workflows

    Teams can customize processes, fees, communication, and reporting to match their operations rather than adapting to rigid defaults. Reviewers on Capterra consistently cite configurability as the top differentiator.

  • Exceptional customer support with 95% retention rate

    Users report submitting questions by end of day and receiving solutions the next morning. The 95% customer retention rate backs up the support quality claims.

  • Rock-solid system stability after 20+ years

    Multiple reviewers note the software has no bugs or glitches. Two decades of development have produced a mature, reliable codebase.

What Tokeet does well

  • Competitive pricing with comprehensive features

    84% of reviews mention pricing positively, appreciating flat per-property pricing with a wide range of functionalities and finding Tokeet more affordable than competitors.

  • Intuitive user interface and quick onboarding

    The interface is sleek and easy to navigate, with new users able to get up to speed without extensive training.

  • Responsive customer support quality

    Support agents provide speedy and professional responses that are kind and patient, helping users resolve issues efficiently despite the lack of phone support.

Where Barefoot falls short

  • Steep learning curve and dated interface

    The UI is not modern and onboarding requires significant setup and training investment. Operators should plan for a real ramp-up period.

  • Airbnb integration is problematic

    Some features available before Airbnb integration are lost after connecting, and setting rates through the integration is challenging. Operators heavy on Airbnb should test carefully.

  • High entry cost shuts out small operators

    At $800/mo for up to 50 units, an operator with 10 listings pays effectively $80/unit/mo — far more than per-listing competitors charging $10–20/unit.

Where Tokeet falls short

  • Steep configuration learning curve

    There is an immense level of configuration necessary to get the best out of Tokeet, with many processes requiring more work than competing platforms to reach equivalent functionality.

  • Limited mobile app functionality

    The mobile app is not user-friendly with limited functionality compared to the full desktop experience.

  • Account management concerns

    Some users reported Tokeet unilaterally changing plans and cancelling subscriptions without consent, leaving them unable to manage OTA connections.

Which Should You Pick

Pick Barefoot if

Established vacation rental companies with 20+ units who need robust customization and don't mind the learning curve.

Skip Barefoot if

You have under 20 units — the $800/mo base cost makes per-unit economics unfavorable compared to per-listing alternatives.

Pick Tokeet if

Small to mid-sized property managers seeking affordable, feature-rich automation with strong channel management.

Skip Tokeet if

You require live phone support or advanced financial management for complex payment structures.

Where Barefoot and Tokeet actually differ

  • Barefoot: $800/mo base covers 1–50 units with $300/mo per additional 50-unit tier and a 1% fee on Airbnb/VRBO rent collected. Tokeet: $14.99/listing/mo with no booking fees. Barefoot's per-unit cost drops below Tokeet's above ~55 units, but for a 10-listing operator Barefoot costs roughly 5x more.
  • Barefoot provides full trust accounting with configurable owner statements and fee structures designed for professional managers handling owner funds. Tokeet offers standard reporting but does not document comparable trust-accounting functionality.
  • Tokeet connects to 8 direct OTA channels including Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, and Homes & Villas by Marriott. Barefoot connects to 3 direct channels (Airbnb, VRBO, TripAdvisor), with its Airbnb integration noted as its weakest channel connection.
  • Barefoot offers an open API and 60+ technology partners, enabling deep custom integrations for enterprise workflows. Tokeet provides a limited API, Zapier connectivity, and 17+ native integrations — easier to set up but less flexible for custom development.
  • Barefoot targets established operators who need maximum configurability and are willing to invest in a steep learning curve. Tokeet, now owned by Hostaway, targets budget-conscious hosts with 3–50 listings who prioritize cost efficiency over deep customization.

Common objections

Tokeet costs a fraction of Barefoot — is enterprise trust accounting really worth $800/mo?
If you manage owner funds across multiple properties and need audit-ready trust accounting with configurable fee structures and owner statements, yes — this is table-stakes functionality that Tokeet doesn't offer. At 50+ units Barefoot's per-unit cost drops to $16–22/unit, competitive with Tokeet's $14.99. Below 20 units, the math doesn't work and Tokeet's pricing is hard to beat.
Tokeet connects to 8 OTA channels versus Barefoot's 3 — doesn't that make Tokeet better for distribution?
For pure channel count, Tokeet wins — Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, and Marriott Homes & Villas are channels Barefoot doesn't connect to directly. Barefoot compensates with 60+ technology partners and an open API, so you can build channel connections through integration partners. If direct OTA breadth is your priority and you don't need enterprise accounting, Tokeet is the stronger choice.
Barefoot's interface is dated — wouldn't Tokeet's newer platform be easier to use?
Both platforms have documented learning curves. Tokeet's configuration complexity is a common user complaint despite its more modern interface. Barefoot's UI is older, but its deep configurability is intentional — it flexes to match complex fee structures, owner reporting, and workflow requirements that simpler platforms can't accommodate. If you don't need that depth, Tokeet is the lighter lift.

Keep Digging

Barefoot

Enterprise PMS that rewards operators who outgrow simpler tools

Tokeet

Strong feature-to-price ratio for budget-conscious property managers