Skip to main content

Comparison

Bookerville vs Rentals United

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management Software

Bookerville

Long-tenured US-built vacation rental PMS with flat-tier pricing

Best Value

Predictable flat-tier pricing from a 15+ year US-owned PMS

From $66.55 • Free trial

Property Management Software

Rentals United

Channel manager with 90+ OTA distribution for professional property managers

Best for Enterprise

Deepest OTA channel catalog for managers who already run a PMS

Contact sales • No free trial

Visit Bookerville →Visit Rentals United →
✓Editorial verdict

Which Should You Pick: Bookerville or Rentals United?

Pick Bookerville if you want an all-in-one PMS with transparent flat-tier pricing and a 30-day free trial for a small-to-mid portfolio. Pick Rentals United if you already run a PMS and need to distribute inventory across 90+ listing channels at professional scale.

Editorial perspective from the Bookerville side; factual claims about Rentals United are drawn from its review.

Pricing Side-by-Side

Bookerville

Full pricing →

From $66.55 • Free trial

Got One

$66.55/mo

  • 1 property
  • Channel manager and booking platform
Try Bookerville

Got Ten

$114.18/mo

  • 10 properties (~$11.42/property/mo effective)
  • Full PMS + channel manager features
Try Bookerville

Got 100

$490.17/mo

  • 100 properties (~$4.90/property/mo effective)
  • Full PMS + channel manager features
Try Bookerville

Rentals United

Full pricing →

Contact sales • No free trial

Contact sales

Rentals United does not publish numeric pricing. The vendor's pricing page lists property-band tiers (Pro for 5-99 properties, Business for 100-499, Enterprise for 500+) and states 'Our prices are tailored to your business.' Capterra confirms 'Starting Price: Contact vendor for pricing' and 'Free Trial: Not available.' Confirm pricing directly with Rentals United sales.

Try Rentals United

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What Bookerville does well

  • Effective per-property rate drops below $5/mo at the 100-property tier

    The published Got 100 tier of $490.17/mo works out to roughly $4.90 per property per month — competitive with much larger platforms at scale, with no per-booking commission added.

  • 30-day trial with no credit card required

    The vendor pricing page confirms 'No setup fee or credit card required to try Bookerville for 30 days', which is rare among PMS vendors and lowers the cost of evaluation.

  • US-owned and operated since 2009 with a documented track record

    Founded by John and Cindy Amato; the homepage publishes lifetime aggregates of 778,783 bookings and $876M+ in booking value processed through the platform.

  • Support reputation is consistently strong in third-party reviews

    GetApp reviewers describe the software as having very few bugs and call out customer service as 'top-notch' — a recurring theme across review sites.

What Rentals United does well

  • Connects to 90+ listing channels including niche regional OTAs

    Every tier advertises certified API connections to 50+ channels and access to 90+ listing channels in total, which is the platform's core differentiator versus PMS-bundled channel managers.

  • API described by integrators as robust and well-documented

    A Capterra reviewer called the API 'absolutely phenomenal' and 'unbelievably robust, brilliantly documented,' and the vendor publishes API documentation as a top-level resource.

  • Preferred-partner status with Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com

    Named preferred-partner programs with the largest OTAs can reduce listing-quality friction for managers routing inventory through Rentals United.

  • Broad PMS interoperability for managers who already have a stack

    The partner page lists integrations with Guesty, Track, Hostfully, Escapia, and Streamline, making it a natural distribution layer behind an existing PMS.

Where Bookerville falls short

  • Limited built-in dynamic pricing and modern automation

    Capterra reviewers consistently flag missing advanced automation and dynamic-pricing features. Operators who want revenue-management built in will need to layer on a third-party tool.

  • Mobile and international guest UX has known rough edges

    Capterra reviews note 'Some guests have indicated issues with the reservation calendar on cell phones' and that 'International guests frequently have trouble with the payment screen' — material for hosts with significant international demand.

  • No way to import historical guest lists from prior software

    GetApp lists 'Cannot import previous guest lists from other software' as a Cons item — managers switching from another PMS will need to rebuild guest history from scratch.

  • Public API and Zapier presence are not documented

    Reachable vendor pages do not publish a REST API or Zapier app, and the Integrations URL returned 404 on 2026-04-26 — operators with custom-integration needs should confirm with sales before committing.

Where Rentals United falls short

  • Interface described as click-heavy and dated

    A GetApp reviewer noted that 'navigation through the system requires more clicks than necessary,' which adds up to real daily operator time at scale.

  • Reports of double-booking incidents and billing disputes

    A GetApp reviewer (jeffrey D.) wrote 'They cost me tens of thousands in double bookings and did not pay any of the fees.' This is a minority report but operationally serious when it happens.

  • No transparent pricing and no free trial

    Capterra lists 'Starting Price: Contact vendor for pricing' and 'Free Trial: Not available,' so buyers cannot evaluate cost without a sales call.

  • Sub-5-listing portfolios are not the core ICP

    The vendor's Pro tier starts at 5-99 properties, with only a 'We can still help!' note for smaller portfolios — signaling smaller hosts will not get the typical onboarding path.

Which Should You Pick

Pick Bookerville if

Owner-operators and small-to-mid managers (1-100 short-term rental units) who want a long-tenured, US-based booking and channel platform with predictable flat-rate tier pricing and a 30-day no-credit-card trial.

Skip Bookerville if

You require modern automation (built-in dynamic pricing, deep smart-lock ecosystems, polished mobile guest UX) or are an enterprise manager expecting a polished modern integration marketplace.

Pick Rentals United if

Professional property managers with 20+ listings already running a PMS who need maximum OTA distribution breadth across niche regional channels in addition to Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com.

Skip Rentals United if

You have fewer than 5 listings, want self-serve transparent monthly pricing, or only need the top 3 OTAs.

Where Bookerville and Rentals United actually differ

  • Bookerville is a full property management system handling bookings, payments, and guest coordination, while Rentals United is a channel manager designed to sit behind an existing PMS.
  • Bookerville publishes flat-rate tiers starting at $66.55/mo with no per-booking fees, whereas Rentals United requires contacting sales for custom pricing with no free trial.
  • Bookerville syncs with five direct OTA channels (Airbnb, Booking.com, Vrbo, HomeAway, Expedia), while Rentals United connects to 90+ listing channels with 50+ certified API integrations.
  • Bookerville offers a 30-day no-credit-card trial and self-serve onboarding; Rentals United uses sales-led onboarding starting at a 5-property minimum.
  • Bookerville lists Rentals United as a channel-distribution integration partner, so operators can pair the two rather than choosing one over the other.

Common objections

Can Rentals United replace Bookerville entirely?
No — Rentals United is a channel manager, not a PMS. It handles distribution to OTAs but does not manage bookings, payments, or guest communication the way Bookerville does. Most operators layer Rentals United on top of a PMS.
Is Bookerville's five-channel reach enough without adding Rentals United?
For operators focused on Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com, and Expedia, Bookerville's built-in channel manager covers the major OTAs. You would need Rentals United mainly if you want reach into regional or niche channels beyond those five.
Does it make sense to use both together?
Yes — Bookerville lists Rentals United as an integration partner. Operators who outgrow Bookerville's five direct channels can add Rentals United for broader distribution without switching PMS platforms.

Keep Digging

Bookerville

Predictable flat-tier pricing from a 15+ year US-owned PMS

Rentals United

Deepest OTA channel catalog for managers who already run a PMS