Skip to main content

Comparison

Boom vs NextPax

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management Software

Boom

AI-first property management system for mid-to-large operators

Best for Automation

Ambitious AI-first PMS with real automation chops — but young, unpriced, and unproven at scale

Contact sales • No free trial

Property Management Software

NextPax

Channel manager and distribution API for mid-to-large operators

Best for Scale

Channel-manager reach for portfolios that can absorb the $250 floor

From $250 • No free trial

Visit Boom →Visit NextPax →

Pricing Side-by-Side

Contact sales • No free trial

Custom

Pricing is not publicly disclosed; prospective customers must book a demo or contact sales. No pricing page exists on the website (/pricing returns 404). Boom is not listed on G2 or Capterra. Source: Lodgify comparison confirms 'does not provide any information regarding pricing on its site.'

Try Boom

From $250 • No free trial

Lite

$250/mo minimum, then $4/unit/mo

  • 10+ units or rooms
  • First 25 units included in the $250 floor
Try NextPax

Professional

$250/mo minimum, then $4/unit/mo

  • 50+ units or rooms
  • Same per-unit rate as Lite
Try NextPax

Enterprise

$250/mo minimum, then $4/unit/mo

  • 500+ units or rooms
  • Same per-unit rate; suited to PMS/white-label partners
Try NextPax

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What Boom does well

  • Deep AI automation across guest comms and operations

    Boom's BAM handles guest messaging 24/7, writes review responses, and auto-creates tasks from guest feedback. One operator said their front office team is 'now available to deal with making our guests happy, rather than dealing with repetitive stuff.'

  • White-glove onboarding and responsive support

    Case studies and reviews consistently highlight hands-on migration support. One operator (250 properties) reported full PMS migration completed in one week with 24/7 support, including weekends.

  • Consolidates multiple tools, potentially cutting software spend

    One reviewer reported saving ~$30k/year in add-on software costs after switching to Boom from a previous PMS stack, managing everything in one place.

What NextPax does well

  • Pay-per-booking commercial model praised in third-party reviews

    GetApp summarizes NextPax's pricing as a 'Pay-per-booking model' meaning 'you only pay them when you make money', and a Capterra reviewer (Director of Reservations, 2023-02-20) specifically called out the same model as a strength.

  • Broad distribution to 150+ channels including major OTAs and GDS

    The vendor integrations page states NextPax connects to '150+ global distribution channel partners' including Booking.com, Airbnb, and Expedia, with GDS connectivity via Amadeus, Sabre, and Travelport.

  • Connects to 25+ named third-party PMSs

    NextPax's PMS integrations page names Opera by Oracle, Mews, Hostfully, Track Hospitality, Escapia, RMS Cloud, LiveRez, and Maxxton — useful for operators who don't want to migrate their PMS to adopt the channel manager.

Where Boom falls short

  • No public pricing — must contact sales

    Boom discloses no pricing on its website and the /pricing URL returns a 404. This makes comparison shopping impossible and suggests custom enterprise-style quoting.

  • Young product with reported stability issues

    Launched around September 2024, two of ten Trustpilot reviews (1-star each) cite bugs and unfinished features. One reviewer warned: 'go for a grown up PMS who have a product that works.'

  • No built-in direct booking website builder

    Unlike Lodgify, Hostaway, and Hospitable, Boom has no native website builder or booking widget. Direct booking sites require a third-party partner integration with ICND.

Where NextPax falls short

  • Property onboarding to OTAs is slow and support-dependent

    Capterra reviewer David D. (Head of IT, 2023-05-09) wrote that the 'Process of creating a new property in all channels is very slow', and Ivana P. (Head of B2B Department, 2022-06-28) cited 'Long time for integration, slow responses from support team'.

  • Reliability complaints — channel connections silently dropping

    Magnus S. (Renting/Accounting, 2025-04-05) on Capterra wrote that the 'system was unstable and unreliable' and that the 'Connection to Airbnb was later lost without warning'.

  • No native promotion sync from NextPax core to channels

    Capterra reviewer David D. (2023-05-09) noted the lack of 'automatic promotion syncing' — promotions cannot be created centrally in NextPax and pushed out, requiring per-channel setup.

Which Should You Pick

Pick Boom if

Mid-to-large STR operators (50–360+ listings) who want an AI-first, all-in-one PMS with automated guest comms, dynamic pricing, and white-glove onboarding support.

Skip Boom if

You're a solo host or small operator who needs transparent pricing, a built-in direct booking website builder, or a mature mobile app — Boom has none of these.

Pick NextPax if

Mid-to-large portfolio managers with 50+ units and PMS vendors needing white-label channel connectivity to major OTAs and GDS.

Skip NextPax if

You operate fewer than ~25 listings — the $250 monthly minimum makes per-unit economics unattractive vs. tools priced purely per-listing.

Keep Digging

Boom

Ambitious AI-first PMS with real automation chops — but young, unpriced, and unproven at scale

NextPax

Channel-manager reach for portfolios that can absorb the $250 floor