Property Management Software
Boom
AI-first property management system for mid-to-large operators
Ambitious AI-first PMS with real automation chops — but young, unpriced, and unproven at scale
Contact sales • No free trial
Comparison
Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.
Property Management Software
AI-first property management system for mid-to-large operators
Ambitious AI-first PMS with real automation chops — but young, unpriced, and unproven at scale
Contact sales • No free trial
Property Management Software
Channel manager and distribution API for mid-to-large operators
Channel-manager reach for portfolios that can absorb the $250 floor
From $250 • No free trial
Contact sales • No free trial
Custom
Pricing is not publicly disclosed; prospective customers must book a demo or contact sales. No pricing page exists on the website (/pricing returns 404). Boom is not listed on G2 or Capterra. Source: Lodgify comparison confirms 'does not provide any information regarding pricing on its site.'
Try BoomFrom $250 • No free trial
Lite
$250/mo minimum, then $4/unit/mo
Professional
$250/mo minimum, then $4/unit/mo
Enterprise
$250/mo minimum, then $4/unit/mo
What Boom does well
Deep AI automation across guest comms and operations
Boom's BAM handles guest messaging 24/7, writes review responses, and auto-creates tasks from guest feedback. One operator said their front office team is 'now available to deal with making our guests happy, rather than dealing with repetitive stuff.'
White-glove onboarding and responsive support
Case studies and reviews consistently highlight hands-on migration support. One operator (250 properties) reported full PMS migration completed in one week with 24/7 support, including weekends.
Consolidates multiple tools, potentially cutting software spend
One reviewer reported saving ~$30k/year in add-on software costs after switching to Boom from a previous PMS stack, managing everything in one place.
What NextPax does well
Pay-per-booking commercial model praised in third-party reviews
GetApp summarizes NextPax's pricing as a 'Pay-per-booking model' meaning 'you only pay them when you make money', and a Capterra reviewer (Director of Reservations, 2023-02-20) specifically called out the same model as a strength.
Broad distribution to 150+ channels including major OTAs and GDS
The vendor integrations page states NextPax connects to '150+ global distribution channel partners' including Booking.com, Airbnb, and Expedia, with GDS connectivity via Amadeus, Sabre, and Travelport.
Connects to 25+ named third-party PMSs
NextPax's PMS integrations page names Opera by Oracle, Mews, Hostfully, Track Hospitality, Escapia, RMS Cloud, LiveRez, and Maxxton — useful for operators who don't want to migrate their PMS to adopt the channel manager.
Where Boom falls short
No public pricing — must contact sales
Boom discloses no pricing on its website and the /pricing URL returns a 404. This makes comparison shopping impossible and suggests custom enterprise-style quoting.
Young product with reported stability issues
Launched around September 2024, two of ten Trustpilot reviews (1-star each) cite bugs and unfinished features. One reviewer warned: 'go for a grown up PMS who have a product that works.'
No built-in direct booking website builder
Unlike Lodgify, Hostaway, and Hospitable, Boom has no native website builder or booking widget. Direct booking sites require a third-party partner integration with ICND.
Where NextPax falls short
Property onboarding to OTAs is slow and support-dependent
Capterra reviewer David D. (Head of IT, 2023-05-09) wrote that the 'Process of creating a new property in all channels is very slow', and Ivana P. (Head of B2B Department, 2022-06-28) cited 'Long time for integration, slow responses from support team'.
Reliability complaints — channel connections silently dropping
Magnus S. (Renting/Accounting, 2025-04-05) on Capterra wrote that the 'system was unstable and unreliable' and that the 'Connection to Airbnb was later lost without warning'.
No native promotion sync from NextPax core to channels
Capterra reviewer David D. (2023-05-09) noted the lack of 'automatic promotion syncing' — promotions cannot be created centrally in NextPax and pushed out, requiring per-channel setup.
Pick Boom if
Mid-to-large STR operators (50–360+ listings) who want an AI-first, all-in-one PMS with automated guest comms, dynamic pricing, and white-glove onboarding support.
Skip Boom if
You're a solo host or small operator who needs transparent pricing, a built-in direct booking website builder, or a mature mobile app — Boom has none of these.
Pick NextPax if
Mid-to-large portfolio managers with 50+ units and PMS vendors needing white-label channel connectivity to major OTAs and GDS.
Skip NextPax if
You operate fewer than ~25 listings — the $250 monthly minimum makes per-unit economics unattractive vs. tools priced purely per-listing.
Boom
Ambitious AI-first PMS with real automation chops — but young, unpriced, and unproven at scale
NextPax
Channel-manager reach for portfolios that can absorb the $250 floor