Skip to main content

Comparison

iGMS vs Tokeet

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management Software

iGMS

Automate 90% of your vacation rental hosting tasks

Best for Small Hosts

Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs

From $14/listing • No free trial

Property Management Software

Tokeet

Affordable per-property vacation rental management with strong channel coverage

Best Value

Strong feature-to-price ratio for budget-conscious property managers

From $14.99/listing • Free trial

Visit iGMS →Visit Tokeet →
✓Editorial verdict

Which Should You Pick: iGMS or Tokeet?

Pick iGMS if you run a small Airbnb/Vrbo portfolio (1–10 listings) and want flexible pricing — the Flex plan at $1/booked night rewards low-occupancy or seasonal properties with real savings over flat-fee competitors. Pick Tokeet if you need broader channel distribution (8 direct OTAs vs 3), a bundled direct booking website builder, and Zapier connectivity at a predictable $14.99/listing/mo flat rate.

Editorial perspective from the iGMS side; factual claims about Tokeet are drawn from its review.

Pricing Side-by-Side

From $14/listing • No free trial

Lite

$14/property/mo

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Multi-channel calendar sync
  • Automated guest messaging
  • Cleaning management
  • Direct booking tools
Try iGMS

Flex

$1/booked night ($20/property minimum)

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Lite
  • Pay-per-use pricing model
Try iGMS

Pro

$18/property/mo

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Lite
  • Advanced features
Try iGMS

Enterprise

Custom

30+ properties

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Pro
  • Custom pricing
Try iGMS

From $14.99/listing • Free trial

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What iGMS does well

  • Strong automation that drives real portfolio growth

    Users report iGMS helped them grow by over 50% and add new units with less effort. The platform automates guest messaging, reviews, and cleaning management.

  • Zero commission on direct bookings

    Direct bookings through iGMS eliminate OTA fees of up to 17%, allowing property managers to keep significantly more revenue compared to listing exclusively on platforms like Airbnb or Vrbo.

  • Proven scale across global operations

    iGMS manages almost 90,000 property listings across 49+ countries and processes more than 500,000 reservations monthly, demonstrating reliable multi-channel sync at scale.

What Tokeet does well

  • Competitive pricing with comprehensive features

    84% of reviews mention pricing positively, appreciating flat per-property pricing with a wide range of functionalities and finding Tokeet more affordable than competitors.

  • Intuitive user interface and quick onboarding

    The interface is sleek and easy to navigate, with new users able to get up to speed without extensive training.

  • Responsive customer support quality

    Support agents provide speedy and professional responses that are kind and patient, helping users resolve issues efficiently despite the lack of phone support.

Where iGMS falls short

  • Financial reporting is a weak point

    95% of reviews on financial reporting say the system offers limited report variations and customizations, making it difficult for operators who need detailed revenue analytics.

  • No accounting software integration

    iGMS lacks built-in accounting features and has no QuickBooks integration, forcing property managers to maintain a completely separate accounting workflow.

  • Calendar sync reliability concerns

    Some users report booking synchronization problems that can lead to double bookings across platforms, which is a serious operational risk for multi-channel hosts.

Where Tokeet falls short

  • Steep configuration learning curve

    There is an immense level of configuration necessary to get the best out of Tokeet, with many processes requiring more work than competing platforms to reach equivalent functionality.

  • Limited mobile app functionality

    The mobile app is not user-friendly with limited functionality compared to the full desktop experience.

  • Account management concerns

    Some users reported Tokeet unilaterally changing plans and cancelling subscriptions without consent, leaving them unable to manage OTA connections.

Which Should You Pick

Pick iGMS if

Small to medium property managers who want to automate 90% of daily hosting tasks across multiple OTAs like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Vrbo from one unified calendar.

Skip iGMS if

Large-scale operations requiring advanced financial reporting, QuickBooks integration, or enterprise-level team management tools.

Pick Tokeet if

Small to mid-sized property managers seeking affordable, feature-rich automation with strong channel management.

Skip Tokeet if

You require live phone support or advanced financial management for complex payment structures.

Where iGMS and Tokeet actually differ

  • iGMS offers three pricing tiers: Lite at $14/property/mo, Flex at $1/booked night ($20/property minimum), and Pro at $18/property/mo. Tokeet charges a flat $14.99/property/mo with no per-booking fees — simpler math, but no way to pay less during slow months.
  • iGMS connects to 3 core OTA channels (Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com); Tokeet connects to 8 direct channels including Expedia, Agoda, Marriott Homes & Villas, Holidu, and Rentals United — a significant edge for operators distributing beyond the big three.
  • Tokeet bundles a website builder (Webready) and dynamic pricing engine (Rategenie) in its base platform; iGMS supports direct bookings but does not document a native website builder or built-in dynamic pricing tool.
  • Tokeet offers Zapier integration and 17+ native integrations (PriceLabs, Mailchimp, Minut); iGMS ships core OTA integrations and direct-booking tools but has no public Zapier app, limiting third-party automation options.
  • Tokeet was acquired by Hostaway in July 2025, providing a built-in upgrade path for growing portfolios; iGMS operates independently with an Enterprise tier for 30+ properties but no affiliated enterprise platform.

Common objections

Is iGMS Flex pricing actually cheaper than Tokeet's flat fee?
It depends on occupancy. Flex charges $1/booked night with a $20/property minimum. At 14 booked nights or fewer you pay the $20 minimum — still above Tokeet's $14.99. Flex only undercuts Tokeet if your minimum kicks in below $14.99, which doesn't happen since the floor is $20. Where Flex helps is cost predictability against iGMS's own Pro tier ($18/mo) for low-occupancy months — but head-to-head against Tokeet's flat rate, Tokeet is cheaper per-property at every occupancy level.
I only use Airbnb and Vrbo — does iGMS's narrower channel list actually matter?
For a two-channel operator, no. iGMS covers Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com with native two-way sync, which is all you need. The gap shows up if you later want Expedia, Agoda, or Marriott distribution — Tokeet has those built in, while iGMS would require a separate channel manager. If expansion isn't on your roadmap, iGMS's focused approach on the big three is a non-issue.
Tokeet has more integrations — does that make iGMS harder to run day-to-day?
Not for basic operations. iGMS handles automated messaging, calendar sync, and cleaning coordination natively. Where the integration gap bites is workflow automation (no Zapier), email marketing (no Mailchimp), and dynamic pricing (no native engine) — if those matter, you'll layer additional tools on top of iGMS, adding cost and complexity that Tokeet bundles in.

Keep Digging

iGMS

Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs

Tokeet

Strong feature-to-price ratio for budget-conscious property managers